Connect with us

Opinion

FCCPC: Tell us, is air travel also not for the poor?

Published

on

AGHAN

By Bola BOLAWOLE

FCCPC airline pricing investigation reveals alleged festive fare hikes, prompting sharp response from Airline Operators of Nigeria

Advertisement

By Bola BOLAWOLE

David Alechenu Bonaventure Mark, remember him? This man was the military governor of Niger state between 1984 and 1986 (straddling the military juntas of Muhammadu Buhari and Ibrahim Babangida).

Also read: Arne Slot Slams Wasteful Liverpool in Painful Wolves Defeat

He, therefore, must have been a prominent member of the group that staged the coup that ousted the country’s first (though, fraudulently?) elected civilian president, Shehu Shagari, thereby truncating democracy in Nigeria.

Advertisement

It is a measure of the forgetfulness of Nigerians, their I-don’t-care attitude to public probity and rectitude, and the fact that there is no consequence for bad behaviour here, that the same man, after pulling off his uniform, was not only elected a senator of the Federal Republic, representing Benue South constituency from 1999 to 2019, he was also the longest-serving president of the upper chamber from 2007 to 2015.

Currently, he serves as the chairman of the opposition conglomerate called the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

Those who truncated democracy at home now tout themselves as African democrats! Their charity begins not at home but abroad! So, like Olusegun Obasanjo and Muhammadu Buhari, Mark is another topnotch beneficiary of the same democracy they had truncated.

Advertisement

Mark was also Nigeria’s Minister of Communication (during the military junta of Babangida) between January 1988 and June 1990.

He will forever be remembered for his statement that telephones are not for the poor; never mind the spirited efforts made later to white-wash and whittle down the impact of that statement!

Maybe we should digress a little to put that ignoble effort at re-writing history to the sword straight away.

Advertisement

Here is what they said: “In Nigeria, myths always are garnished and promoted to facts. Up till tomorrow, Nigerians will quote David Mark as saying telephone is not for the poor. But what he said as Minister of Communication was that NITEL would disconnect the lines of its debtors. He said they could not claim that they were too poor to settle their bills. Poor people, he added, didn’t own telephones. The headline the following day was ‘Telephone is not for the poor – David Mark’”.

Now, judge! What can you infer from that statement by David Mark? How do you interpret it? Since you own a telephone line, you are not poor; so pay for it.

If you are poor, you cannot own a telephone line because you cannot pay for it! To own a telephone line, you must be rich, not poor! Wetin poor man dey take find telephone? Who dash monkey bananas? Ask any sub-editor worth his salt to cast that headline, it will still be “Telephone is not for the poor!” The inference is clear and direct.

Advertisement

In all modesty and with a deep sense of humility, I have been editor many times over, and the same headline is what I will cast!

Talking seriously, however, David Mark was correct. Those were the days when telephones were really not for the poor. People had to keep vigil at NITEL offices to make calls.

The telephone box was a status symbol. At PUNCH newspapers at the time, only three of us carried the Mobitel 090 luggage of a phone – the Chairman, Chief Ajibola Ogunshola; the MD, Demola Osinubi; and my humble self, Bola Bolawole, as the editor.

Advertisement

But, today, how does David Mark feel seeing that telephones are no longer for the rich but every Tom, Dick, and Harry carries a phone?

Those who were in positions but offered nothing to improve the life of the people, who again gallivant seeking leadership positions, we should ask them what they did with the opportunities that came their way!

That is one reason for this digression. The other is to hope that one day, air travel, which today is not for the poor, will also become available and affordable to the poor as well!

Advertisement

How many Nigerians can afford air travel today? Except you are a political appointee. Top government official. You work in an organization that foots the bill.

You live and luxuriate on the proceeds of crime. Very few people spending hard-earned money can still afford air travel.

To complicate matters for the citizenry are the twin evils of bad roads and insecurity.

Advertisement

You must pray, do vigil and commit your ways into the hands of God before travelling on our roads these days.

When people complain about the proliferation of airports, the hazards of road travel account majorly for it.

Those in leadership positions taking the decision to build all sorts of phoney airports under all manner of guises simply want to avoid the road.

Advertisement

And they can afford it because they fall within the categories listed above of those who can still pay the cut-throat air fares charged by shylock airlines.

Hence, my interest when I read of the efforts of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) to investigate the way airlines inflate and skyrocket air fares like the typical Lagos “molue” and “danfo” drivers.

Once there is a crowd at bus stops and at airports, fares flare! During festive periods when people have to travel, they hike fares to collect “owo odun!” Once buses or aircraft scarcity is experienced, passengers and travellers must pay triple fares.

Advertisement

There is hardly any noticeable difference between the motor parks and our nation’s airports!

I also read of the intransigence of the Airline Operators of Nigeria, trying to rubbish the FCCPC initiative. The FCCPC must not buldge but should carry the initiative also to the foreign airlines like it has vowed.

Some of the preliminary findings of the FCCPC are damning enough. A report that I read had this to say:

Advertisement

“A review undertaken by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has uncovered patterns of price manipulation perpetrated by some local airlines during the last festive season.

The findings are contained in the interim report released … by the Commission’s department of Surveillance and Investigations…

“The report compares domestic airline pricing from the December 2025 festive period with post-peak January 2026 fare levels.

Advertisement

Preliminary analysis indicates that fares recorded during the December peak were materially higher than those observed in the post-peak period across several routes despite relative stability in critical operating variables like fuel price, government taxes and foreign exchange.

The differences observed in fares therefore appear to reflect airlines’ arbitrary pricing decisions, including yield management and capacity allocation, rather than any variation in regulatory fees…

“Commenting… the Executive Vice-chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the FCCPC, Mr. Tunji Bello, said the review is part of the Commission’s statutory responsibility to promote competitive markets and safeguard consumers. ‘This assessment is intended to provide clarity on pricing behaviour during predictable peak travel periods. The Commission’s role is not to disrupt legitimate commercial activity but to ensure that market outcomes remain consistent with competition and consumer protection principles under the law’”, Bello was quoted as saying.

Advertisement

Yes, consumers rights must be protected. This is a country under law, and not one governed according to the whims and caprices of buccaneers.

As would be expected, the airline operators have responded, albeit hastily, to the FCCPC, shipping it off as ignorant! A news report that I read put it this way:

“Domestic airlines, under the aegis of the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON), have strongly dismissed allegations of price manipulation and fixing brought by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC)… Reacting, AON raised concerns over the agency’s interference in ticket pricing, saying it is detrimental to the survival of domestic operators. AON, which dismissed the outcome of the probe, said FCCPC lacked knowledge about the economics of airlines and did not possess the professional expertise to engage in how airlines fix prices.”

Advertisement

Really! Is airline operation rocket science? Or are the AON re-inventing the wheel as far as airline management is concerned? Professor Obiora Okonkwo, who spoke for AON, said he was yet to read the details of the FCCPC report; yet, he had gone ahead to dismiss it as hogwash!

“They don’t know the economics of airlines and do not possess the professional expertise to dabble into how prices are fixed. They don’t understand airline operations and as far as the AON is concerned, they are playing to the gallery and should not be taken seriously”, he said.

Waooh! Some professors! Someone who was yet to avail himself with the full details of a report; yet, felt comfortable enough to disparage the organization and thrash its report – just like that!

Advertisement

Back to my question as we draw the curtains: Is air travel also not for the poor? I am sure you know this question is hypothetical and the answer is not one dangling in the air.

Air travel is not for the poor as we speak, just like telephones were not for the poor in 1989. In this, David Mark and Professor Okonkwo appear as kindred spirits.

But in future, possibly in our own lifetime, one of two things will happen: Either air fares will descend from its high horse and Olympian height to meet the poor or Nigeria’s poor would have been taken out of poverty – like Chinese leaders have taken hundreds of millions of their people out of poverty within a generation – to a point where air travel, like telephone, will no longer be the exclusive preserve of the rich.

Advertisement

Also read: Zamfara Governor Lawal Weighs Political Options Amid PDP Legal Disputes

Let the FCCPC keep holding their feet to the fire!

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Xenophobia: Africa must unite, not divide

Published

on

Xenophobia

By Ehi Braimah

 

Advertisement

Amid the diplomatic tensions between Nigeria and South Africa, another Nigerian named Ibeh Chika Simon, 42, died during a South Africa Police Service (SAPS) operation in Bellville, Cape Town, in Western Cape Province on July 23.

Amid the diplomatic tensions between Nigeria and South Africa, another Nigerian named Ibeh Chika Simon, 42, died during a South Africa Police Service (SAPS) operation in Bellville, Cape Town, in Western Cape Province on July 23.

Also read: Senate Warns South Africa Over Xenophobic Attacks

Witnesses and community groups alleged he was tortured, beaten and suffocated with a plastic bag during the raid. Another Nigerian, Patrick Chuks Egwabor, was reportedly shot and injured during the same operation.

Advertisement

Nigerian Consul-General in Johannesburg, Ninikanwa Okey-Uche, strongly condemned the death, and demanded a transparent, independent probe into recurring extrajudicial deaths involving security personnel.

Nigerians and other African migrants are being killed and forced to leave South Africa arising from the resurgence of xenophobic violence which, clearly, is one of the greatest moral contradictions confronting post-apartheid Africa.

Three decades after the dismantling of institutional racism, the country that inspired the world with Nelson Mandela’s message of reconciliation is witnessing repeated attacks against fellow Africans whose only “crime” is seeking opportunities to work, trade and build better lives.

Advertisement

Sentiment analysis indicates that the hostility directed at African migrants in South Africa is driven by a complex mix of extreme socio-economic frustrations, political scapegoating, inequalities, historical isolation, hunger, laziness, unemployment, and viral anti-immigrant activism.

The local elections are due in November, and as South Africa prepares for the vote, political analysts and rival parties have heavily criticised Jacob Zumah’s MK Party of fueling anti-immigrant sentiments.

MK Party has been accused of weaponising public frustration over extreme unemployment, poverty and state failures to gain electoral advantage.

Advertisement

Recent campaigns by the March and March Movement and Operation Dudula, which demanded that foreign African nationals leave South Africa ahead of the June 30 deadline, represents not merely an attack on migrants but a direct assault on the ideals upon which modern Africa was built.

While inflammatory rhetoric often targets Nigerians, Zimbabweans, Malawians, Mozambicans, Zambians, Ethiopians, Ghanaians, Somalis and other African nationals, it is striking that white immigrants and foreign investors rarely become the focus of such organised hostility.

This selective outrage exposes the uncomfortable reality that the problem is not immigration alone; it is Afrophobia directed against fellow Africans.

Advertisement

South Africans who embrace xenophobic violence have become poor students of history. They appear to have forgotten the enormous sacrifices made by African countries during the long struggle against apartheid. Nigeria, in particular, stood firmly with South Africa when much of the world hesitated.

Successive Nigerian governments contributed financially to the liberation struggle, imposed sanctions against the apartheid regime, offered scholarships to South African students in exile and mobilised international opinion against racial oppression.

Millions of ordinary Nigerians voluntarily contributed through the Southern African Relief Fund, believing that the freedom of South Africa was the responsibility of all Africans.

Advertisement

Nigeria was not alone. Zambia provided sanctuary for liberation fighters. Tanzania hosted the headquarters of liberation movements.

Mozambique, Angola, Zimbabwe, Botswana and many other African nations paid heavy economic and security costs because they stood on the side of justice.

Across the continent, African governments accepted refugees, financed resistance movements and defended South Africa’s right to freedom in international forums.

Advertisement

The vision that inspired these sacrifices was much bigger than the liberation of one country. Ghana’s first President, Kwame Nkrumah, dreamed of a politically and economically united Africa capable of determining its own destiny.

Nelson Mandela similarly believed that South Africa’s freedom would remain incomplete unless the entire continent prospered in peace and solidarity.

The African Union, which succeeded the Organisation of African Unity, inherited this vision of continental integration, cooperation and free movement.

Advertisement

Today, that noble dream is under serious threat.

When African migrants are hunted in townships, their businesses looted, their homes burnt and their families terrorised, Africa loses a part of its collective soul.

The victims are not statistics. They are fathers, mothers, students, traders, artisans, professionals and entrepreneurs who have invested years of hard work in building livelihoods.

Advertisement

Many possess valid immigration documents; work permits or permanent residence status. Yet, legality often provides little protection when mobs take the law into their own hands.

The humanitarian consequences are heartbreaking. Families are uprooted overnight; children abandon their education, and businesses painstakingly built over many years are destroyed within hours. Savings accumulated over decades disappear in acts of arson and looting.

Many migrants return home traumatised, carrying nothing except painful memories of violence and rejection. Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Zambia, Mozambique and several other African countries have repeatedly received distressed returnees who must begin life all over again.

Advertisement

The Nigerian government has repeatedly expressed concern over the deaths of Nigerian nationals in violent attacks over the years, underscoring the urgent need for stronger protection and accountability.

Regardless of the precise number, every life lost represents a profound tragedy and a reminder that no African should die simply because he or she chose to live or work in another African country.

The economic argument often advanced by xenophobic groups is equally flawed. Foreign African entrepreneurs frequently establish businesses in communities underserved by formal retail chains, create employment for local residents, pay taxes, rent commercial property and contribute to economic activity.

Advertisement

Rather than causing unemployment, many become job creators. South Africa’s unemployment crisis stems from deep structural economic challenges that cannot be solved by intimidating vulnerable migrants.

Equally troubling is the rise of hate speech that portrays African migrants as criminals responsible for every social ill. Such dangerous generalisations inflame public anger and legitimise violence.

Criminal behaviour should always be addressed through law enforcement against individuals, not through collective punishment based on nationality. The rule of law cannot coexist with mob justice.

Advertisement

As African leaders prepare for the African Union Extraordinary Summit on Conflict Prevention and Resolution in Angola from August 29 – 30, xenophobia and Afrophobia deserve urgent attention.

The African Union cannot remain silent while one of its founding principles is systematically undermined.

The AU’s Agenda 2063 envisions “An Integrated, Prosperous and Peaceful Africa.” That aspiration cannot coexist with violent campaigns demanding that fellow Africans leave another African country.

Advertisement

Moreover, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights guarantees dignity, equality before the law and protection from discrimination.

The Protocol relating to the African Economic Community and the African Continental Free Trade Area equally seek to deepen regional integration by facilitating the movement of people, goods, services and investment.

Continental economic integration cannot flourish where fear and violence replace trust and cooperation.

Advertisement

South Africa’s government bears the primary responsibility for protecting everyone living within its borders, irrespective of nationality.

Peaceful protests may be protected under democratic principles, but intimidation, incitement, destruction of property and mob violence are criminal acts that demand firm prosecution. Failure to hold perpetrators accountable only emboldens future attacks.

Although President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa sent a delegation led by Ronald Lamola, the country’s minister of International Relations and Cooperation to Abuja for diplomatic engagements over the attack on Nigerians, Ramaphosa should be told in clear terms that his government is not going far enough to solve the problem.

Advertisement

There’s no way South Africa can stand alone as an island, separated from the rest of Africa and an interconnected world.

Nigeria’s President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, should be commended for showing restraint over the provocations from South Africa that undermine decades of cordial relations between both countries.

How can a South African Minister be saying on national television that Nigeria should show them where the drug dens are?

Advertisement

Governments across Africa must strengthen cooperation on migration management, documentation, intelligence sharing and employment policies. Migration is a global phenomenon that requires coordinated solutions, not xenophobia.

Political leaders, religious institutions, civil society organisations, schools and the media must actively promote tolerance and remind younger generations of the shared history that united Africa against colonialism and apartheid.

Africa’s destiny lies not in division but in unity. Kwame Nkrumah’s dream of continental integration and Nelson Mandela’s vision of reconciliation remain as relevant today as ever.

Advertisement

To betray fellow Africans through xenophobia is to betray the very struggle that delivered South Africa from apartheid.

The answer to unemployment is economic reform, not hatred, and effective policing, not ethnic profiling, will address criminality.

Cyril Ramaphosa must understand that accountable governance, not scapegoating and criminalising vulnerable migrants, will reduce frustration among jobless South Africans.

Advertisement

Africa cannot build a single market while destroying our common humanity.

The African Union must speak with one voice against xenophobia and Afrophobia, demand accountability for perpetrators of violence and reaffirm that every African deserves dignity, security and equal protection under the law wherever they lawfully reside on the continent.

History will judge Africa not only by how it defeated apartheid, but also by whether it refused to replace one form of intolerance with another.

Advertisement

Also read: Senate Warns South Africa Over Xenophobic Attacks

Africa must unite, not divide. That is the only path to fulfilling the dreams of Kwame Nkrumah, Nelson Mandela and the founding fathers of African unity.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending