Connect with us

Economy

Gas Shortage Worsens Nigeria Power Outages

Published

on

Gas

Nigeria power outages deepen as system operator blames inadequate gas supply to thermal plants for declining electricity generation nationwide

Nigeria’s lingering nationwide electricity disruptions are primarily caused by inadequate gas supply to thermal power plants, the Nigerian Independent System Operator announced on Friday, confirming that persistent Nigeria power outages stem from severe fuel constraints affecting generation on the national grid.

Advertisement

Also read: EEDC Attributes Southeast Power Drop to Gas Shortage

In a statement titled Declining Power Output Attributable to Generation Shortfalls and Gas Supply Limitations, released via its official communication channels, the system operator disclosed that average available electricity generation has dropped to about 4,300 megawatts, significantly below the country’s installed capacity.

The operator explained that the outages began in early February following scheduled maintenance works on critical gas infrastructure undertaken by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited and Seplat Energy, which temporarily disrupted gas deliveries to several thermal generating stations.

Although the maintenance exercise has ended, gas supply limitations have persisted, prolonging the power shortfall across the country.

Advertisement

According to the statement signed by NISO management, thermal power plants, which constitute the backbone of Nigeria’s electricity supply, are currently operating far below optimal levels due to fuel shortages.

The agency revealed that thermal plants collectively require approximately 1,629.75 million standard cubic feet of gas daily to function efficiently.

However, actual supply as of February 23, 2026 stood at about 692 million standard cubic feet per day, representing less than 43 per cent of required volume.

Advertisement

Officials described the deficit as severe, noting that reduced gas availability has directly weakened electricity generation and energy allocation to Distribution Companies nationwide.

The shortfall has compelled grid managers to implement load shedding measures to stabilise the system and prevent widespread disturbances.

NISO explained that when total generation falls sharply, controlled rationing becomes necessary to maintain grid stability while electricity is distributed according to allocation percentages approved by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Advertisement

The operator expressed regret over the continued inconvenience faced by households and businesses but assured that engagements with industry stakeholders are ongoing to restore supply levels once gas availability improves.

Nigeria’s electricity sector remains heavily dependent on gas-fired thermal plants, which account for more than 70 per cent of grid generation, leaving supply highly vulnerable to disruptions in gas production, infrastructure maintenance, pricing disputes and payment challenges within the power value chain.

Industry experts note that longstanding liquidity constraints, foreign exchange pressures and debts owed by generating companies to gas suppliers have continued to complicate fuel supply arrangements.

Advertisement

Despite recent structural reforms separating the system operator from the Transmission Company of Nigeria to strengthen transparency and grid management, electricity output remains closely tied to consistent fuel availability.

With national peak electricity demand estimated to exceed 20,000 megawatts, the current average generation level highlights a critical and widening energy gap confronting Africa’s most populous nation.

Also read: PENGASSAN President Criticises Oil Revenue Executive Order

Until gas deliveries improve and generating capacity rebounds, electricity consumers nationwide are expected to continue experiencing outages and supply rationing.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Owei Lakemfa criticises Tinubu’s fuel subsidy policy

Published

on

Owei Lakemfa fuel subsidy criticism challenges Tinubu’s petrol policy, highlighting rising prices, workers’ purchasing power and Nigeria’s refining challenges

Advertisement

Nigerian columnist and former journalist Owei Lakemfa has criticised President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidies, arguing in an opinion article published by Vanguard on Monday, 26 October 2026, that Nigeria’s persistent fuel-price pressures reflect years of policy failures, inadequate domestic refining and weak public accountability rather than an unavoidable shortage of petroleum resources.

Also read:Mbappé, Yamal, Kane, Olise Battle for Ballon d’Or

In his article, titled We Never Left Egypt, Only Prodigals Need to Return Home, Lakemfa challenges Tinubu’s comparison between the biblical story of Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt and the government’s decision not to restore petrol subsidies.

Advertisement

The columnist uses the metaphor to argue that Nigerians should not be expected to accept worsening living conditions in a country endowed with substantial natural resources.

The article follows remarks made by Tinubu on 19 October at an event organised by the City Boy Movement, where the President defended the removal of petrol subsidies and rejected calls to restore the policy.

Advertisement

“I came and I removed subsidy the first day. I knew Nigeria would go bankrupt. There was nothing left to pay subsidy,” Tinubu said, according to TheCable’s report of the event.

Advertisement

The President also invoked the biblical account of Moses and the Red Sea, arguing that Nigeria should not return to the former subsidy arrangement.

He urged young Nigerians to obtain their permanent voter cards and participate in the 2027 presidential election.

Advertisement

Lakemfa takes a sharply different view. He argues that Nigeria’s oil resources, historical refining capacity and revenue potential should provide a stronger foundation for economic security than many households currently experience.

The columnist recalls Nigeria’s development of commercial oil production in the 1950s and its subsequent operation of four state-owned refineries.

Advertisement

He also cites a 1973 statement by former Head of State Yakubu Gowon that money was not Nigeria’s principal problem, but how it was spent.

For Lakemfa, the central question is not whether the country possesses oil, but how successive administrations have managed its petroleum resources and the revenues generated from them.

Advertisement

He alleges that years of inadequate refinery maintenance, insufficient investment in domestic refining and dependence on imported petroleum products have contributed to the difficulties facing consumers.

He also questions the cost structures associated with importing, transporting and distributing petrol.

Advertisement

His criticism reflects a wider debate over whether Nigeria can reduce its exposure to international oil-price movements and foreign-exchange pressures by strengthening domestic refining and improving transparency across the petroleum supply chain.

Advertisement

Nigeria’s fuel-subsidy debate predates the current administration. Successive governments have struggled with the cost of keeping petrol prices below market levels, concerns over smuggling, the financial burden on public finances and disputes over whether the benefits of subsidised fuel reach the intended beneficiaries.

Tinubu announced the removal of petrol subsidies during his inauguration on 29 May 2023.

Advertisement

The decision triggered a sharp increase in pump prices and contributed to public concern over transportation costs, inflation and household purchasing power.

Lakemfa argues that the promised developmental benefits of subsidy removal have not adequately addressed the pressures experienced by ordinary Nigerians.

Advertisement

He points to concerns about public infrastructure, healthcare, education, housing and insecurity, while questioning how the additional revenues generated by the policy have been allocated and accounted for.

The Federal Government, however, maintains that retaining the former subsidy arrangement would impose an unsustainable financial burden.

Advertisement

It has argued that the reform is intended to improve fiscal stability and redirect public resources towards development priorities.

In October 2026, the Presidency announced additional measures to cushion the impact of rising global petroleum costs.

Advertisement

These included a temporary decision by NNPC Retail to forgo its petrol retail profit margin, alongside plans involving crude-oil supplies to domestic refineries and efforts to moderate fluctuations in fuel costs.

Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister of the Economy Taiwo Oyedele said the measures were intended to provide relief without restoring a blanket subsidy.

Advertisement

The government maintained that targeted interventions and support for domestic refining would be preferable to returning to a system that it considers financially unsustainable.

Rising international oil prices have also contributed to recent increases in Nigerian petrol prices. Nairametrics reported in September that petrol was selling at approximately ₦1,400 to ₦1,450 per litre in major cities, reflecting the influence of higher crude prices and wider market pressures.

Advertisement

Lakemfa nevertheless questions the extent to which international developments explain the difference between Nigeria’s pump prices and those in other oil-producing countries.

Advertisement

He draws on figures attributed to federal lawmaker Afam Victor Ogene, who compared petrol prices and minimum wages in Nigeria, Iran, Libya and Saudi Arabia.

The figures cited in the comparison placed Nigerian petrol at between ₦1,300 and ₦1,500 per litre, against substantially lower prices in the other countries.

Advertisement

A report by NN News Media published on 22 September also carried Ogene’s comparison, including the claim that Nigeria’s ₦70,000 national minimum wage buys significantly less petrol than the stated wage levels in the three other countries.

The comparison highlights the relationship between fuel prices and workers’ purchasing power.

Advertisement

However, the figures should be treated as attributed estimates rather than a fully standardised international comparison, as petrol pricing policies, exchange rates, wage coverage and subsidy arrangements differ between countries.

The Nigerian minimum wage was raised to ₦70,000 under legislation signed by Tinubu in July 2024. Since then, organised labour has continued to raise concerns about the erosion of workers’ purchasing power amid rising transportation, food and other household costs.

Advertisement

The Nigeria Labour Congress called in October 2026 for lower petrol prices and renewed minimum-wage negotiations, arguing that the existing wage floor had become inadequate in the face of escalating living expenses.

Advertisement

Lakemfa also challenges warnings attributed to Oyedele about the economic consequences of restoring petrol subsidies.

According to the columnist, predictions of further currency depreciation and petrol prices reaching ₦2,000 per litre require transparent calculations and supporting economic analysis.

Advertisement

The government’s position is that a return to blanket subsidies could increase fiscal pressures, encourage smuggling and expose public finances to renewed shocks.

The disagreement therefore extends beyond the immediate price of petrol to questions about the country’s fiscal priorities, energy policy and the distribution of economic costs.

Advertisement

At the heart of Lakemfa’s argument is the belief that Nigeria’s natural-resource wealth should translate into better living conditions for its population.

His reference to Egypt serves as a political metaphor for a country whose citizens, he argues, should not be expected to accept hardship as an inevitable consequence of economic reform.

Advertisement

He concludes that the responsibility for improving the country’s circumstances rests with its political leadership, calling for greater accountability and a renewed commitment to public welfare.

The debate over subsidy removal is likely to remain prominent as political parties prepare for the 2027 elections.

Advertisement

For the Federal Government, the challenge is to demonstrate that its economic reforms can deliver measurable benefits while protecting public finances.

Also read:Mbappé, Yamal, Kane, Olise Battle for Ballon d’Or

For critics such as Lakemfa, the priority is to ensure that the costs of reform do not continue to fall disproportionately on households already struggling with rising living expenses.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending