Connect with us

news

Presidency Rejects Speculation on Tinubu FBI Files

Published

on

Presidency

Nigerian Presidency rejects speculation on Tinubu FBI files, clarifying the FOIA case as a civil records dispute with 399 pages released under redactions

Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy Bayo Onanuga issued a detailed statement in Abuja on 3 September 2026 clarifying the nature of an ongoing civil case before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Also read: Disu Grants N2.32bn Relief to Deceased Police Families

The Presidency rejected speculation that proceedings amount to a criminal action, describing them instead as a routine Freedom of Information Act dispute over historical records held by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Advertisement

Mr Onanuga explained that the matter began in 2022 when American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan submitted FOIA requests seeking documents linked to President Tinubu and others connected with a Chicago heroin trafficking investigation from the early 1990s.

After agencies withheld certain material or declined to confirm its existence, Mr Greenspan filed Civil Action No. 23-1816 in 2023. The court later allowed President Tinubu to join as an intervenor to protect privacy interests.

Several agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of State, the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, successfully argued a Glomar defence and were removed from the case.

Advertisement

The FBI and DEA remained and, in compliance with orders from Judge Beryl A. Howell, produced 399 pages of records with portions redacted under established United States law. Mr Greenspan has challenged those redactions, citing the public interest in full disclosure.

The FBI, DEA and President Tinubu’s legal team have defended the withholdings on grounds that include grand jury secrecy, personal privacy protections under FOIA Exemption 7(C), attorney-client privilege and the need to safeguard investigative techniques and confidential sources.

“For clarity, the matter is a civil records-disclosure dispute under the United States Freedom of Information Act. It is not a criminal case against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, nor has the court found him guilty of any criminal wrongdoing,” Mr Onanuga stated. He added that the release or withholding of records under FOIA does not by itself establish criminal liability.

Advertisement

The current dispute sits against a longer history. A February 2003 letter from the American Consulate in Lagos to then Inspector-General of Police Tafa Balogun recorded that an FBI check had found no criminal arrest records, warrants or wanted notices relating to the then Lagos State Governor.

Supporters of greater transparency, including some civil society groups and opposition voices, continue to press for fuller release of the material, particularly as Nigeria approaches the 2027 elections. The Presidency has noted that neither Karl von Batten nor his client holds formal standing in the proceedings.

The plaintiff has until 11 September 2026 to file any opposition. The FBI, DEA and President Tinubu’s team then have until 18 September 2026 to respond. Judge Howell will determine whether the redactions applied to the Tinubu FBI files remain lawful.

Advertisement

Also read: Disu Grants N2.32bn Relief to Deceased Police Families

The outcome will settle a procedural question about access to decades-old government records rather than reopen settled criminal questions.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

sports

Maresca Says Man City Unity Grows Amid Financial Case

Published

on

Maresca says Man City unity grows amid the club’s financial case as the manager focuses on results ahead of Saturday’s Premier League clash with Ipswich.

Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca has said the club’s players, supporters and leadership have become more united amid the Premier League financial case, speaking at a pre-match press conference in Manchester on Friday, 16 October 2026, ahead of Saturday’s league meeting with Ipswich Town.

Also read: NPFL Suspends Fan Over Alleged Threats to Away Teams

Maresca said he was not personally troubled by the controversy, arguing that the team had little control over the proceedings and should concentrate on performances on the pitch.

Advertisement

“Since the noise, from my personal point of view, I can see the fans, the club, the team more together, for sure,” Maresca said.

His comments come as City continue their Premier League campaign under the scrutiny of a significant disciplinary case.

An independent commission found the club guilty of multiple breaches of the league’s financial regulations, following allegations concerning its financial reporting and commercial arrangements between 2009 and 2018.

Advertisement

Manchester City have rejected the findings and appealed the decision, maintaining that they have evidence to challenge the ruling. The appeal means the dispute remains unresolved, with the eventual outcome potentially carrying significant consequences for the club.

For now, Maresca has sought to keep the focus on football, presenting the team’s response to the controversy as a matter of discipline and collective responsibility rather than public argument.

“There is noise around the club but we need to try to make our noise,” he said. “That means win at Anfield, try to win tomorrow against Ipswich. This is the way we can make our noise. A different kind of noise; we’re not able to control that.”

Advertisement

City’s recent results have offered both encouragement and a reminder of the demands of competing across several fronts.

The club recorded a 3-0 Premier League victory over Liverpool at Anfield before suffering a 4-2 defeat by Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League on Wednesday.

Maresca described the European loss as a learning opportunity, saying City had struggled to maintain their balance after conceding twice in quick succession.

Advertisement

He nevertheless pointed to the response after half-time as evidence that the players could recover from difficult spells.

The defeat has added importance to Saturday’s meeting with Ipswich, as City look to maintain their domestic momentum while managing the demands of a busy schedule.

Asked how he was coping with the attention surrounding the financial proceedings, Maresca was direct.

Advertisement

“I’m very happy. I don’t feel any kind of stress about the outside situation because it’s something I don’t control. I just focus on how we can try to win the next games,” he said.

The manager also indicated that he trusted the club’s leadership and had discussed the case with officials. However, he preferred to wait for the legal process to reach an outcome before drawing conclusions about the matter.

The independent commission’s findings have intensified scrutiny of City’s financial conduct, with the case involving alleged breaches over a nine-season period.

Advertisement

The commission found the club guilty of 114 of the 115 charges relating to financial misconduct and associated failures to comply with the Premier League’s investigation, according to reports on the ruling.

City have appealed and continue to contest the findings. The distinction between the commission’s conclusions and the club’s position remains central to the ongoing dispute.

The case has also renewed debate about financial regulation in English football, including the effectiveness of oversight and the consequences clubs may face when they breach competition rules.

Advertisement

Any eventual sanctions will depend on the relevant proceedings and their outcome.

Against that background, Maresca’s emphasis on unity reflects the club’s immediate priority of sustaining results while the case progresses.

His comments do not resolve the questions raised by the commission, but they indicate how he intends to manage the situation within the dressing room.

Advertisement

Saturday’s fixture presents a further test. Ipswich have had a full week to prepare, while City return to domestic action after their midweek European commitment.

Maresca acknowledged that the difference in preparation time could make the contest demanding.

A victory would give City the opportunity to extend their Premier League winning run to seven matches, reinforcing their position near the top of the table.

Advertisement

The manager’s challenge is to ensure that the off-field controversy does not distract from the consistency required over a long season.

For supporters, the coming weeks will bring two parallel developments: City’s pursuit of domestic and European success, and the progress of the financial appeal.

The club’s results may shape the mood around the team, but the disciplinary proceedings will ultimately be determined by the relevant legal and regulatory process.

Advertisement

Maresca’s message was that City should concentrate on the part of the situation they can influence.

Also read: NPFL Suspends Fan Over Alleged Threats to Away Teams

With Ipswich next on the schedule, the immediate measure of that approach will be the team’s performance on the pitch, while the broader questions surrounding the club’s financial conduct remain outstanding.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending