Connect with us

Opinion

Wole Soyinka at 92: Nigeria’s literary titan, Africa’s conscience and global intellectual powerhouse

Published

on

Wole Soyinka

By Ehi Braimah

There are writers, there are intellectuals, and there are moral giants whose influence transcends literature to shape the conscience of nations.

Advertisement

Professor Akinwande Oluwole Babatunde Soyinka belongs unmistakably to the latter category. As he celebrates his 92nd birthday, the world salutes not merely Nigeria’s greatest literary icon, but one of humanity’s most enduring champions of justice, freedom and the dignity of the human spirit.

Also read: UBA Business Series Features M.I Abaga, Chowdeck CEO to Drive Startup Conversations

As he celebrates his 92nd birthday, the world salutes not merely Nigeria’s greatest literary icon, but one of humanity’s most enduring champions of justice, freedom and the dignity of the human spirit.

For over seven decades, Wole Soyinka (Kongi) has stood as an unyielding voice against oppression, tyranny and intolerance. His life has been defined by extraordinary courage, immense scholarship and a solid commitment to truth, regardless of the consequences.

Advertisement

He is not simply a Nobel laureate; he is an institution whose intellectual influence stretches from Africa to Europe, the Americas and Asia.

I had the chance of a close encounter with Kongi in August 2023, when Jahman Anikulapo, my brother, friend and colleague (Anikulapo is Editorial Director of Naija Times) and Soyinka’s trusted mentee, invited me to a Public Exchange, titled “Isese, Samarkand and Other Markets of the Mind,” held at Kongi’s Harvest Art Gallery, Freedom Park, Lagos.

The Isese masterclass in public intellectual engagement was far more than a lecture on Yoruba traditional religion – it became an important conversation on religious freedom, cultural identity, intellectual inquiry and democratic values.

Advertisement

At the Isese forum, we had journalists, academics, writers, lawyers, artists, theatre practitioners, traditional religious adherents, diplomats, and cultural enthusiasts.

The interdisciplinary gathering of minds reflects Soyinka’s remarkable ability to convene diverse audiences.

The event came against the backdrop of controversy surrounding the celebration of Isese Day, particularly in Kwara State, where traditional worshippers faced hostility.

Advertisement

Soyinka argued that Isese is not antagonistic to Christianity or Islam, but represents a legitimate spiritual and philosophical tradition deserving equal respect under Nigeria’s Constitution.

He maintained that those who sought to suppress other people’s beliefs demonstrated insecurity rather than religious strength.

That’s Kongi for you, a global intellectual giant and highly respected cultural influencer.

Advertisement

By describing Isese as a “quest for illumination of the human condition,” Soyinka shifted the discussion beyond ritual and religion.

He presented Isese as a repository of ethics, philosophy, history, aesthetics, and indigenous knowledge.

In doing so, he challenged long-held prejudices that equate African traditional beliefs with superstition, inviting Nigerians to engage seriously with their own civilisational heritage.

Advertisement

What I found interesting was that Soyinka didn’t deliver a lecture, but engaged in an extended dialogue, fielding questions and encouraging debate.

This reinforced his lifelong belief that knowledge flourishes through critical inquiry rather than dogma.

After the Isese event, Anikulapo was able to get Soyinka to be interviewed for a recorded goodwill message for the third anniversary of Naija Times which held in Abuja on October 19, 2023. His message was that the media must be independent and influence purposeful leadership.

Advertisement

When Soyinka became the first African to receive the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1986, the award recognised far more than literary brilliance.

It honoured a writer who had expanded the boundaries of world literature while remaining deeply rooted in African history, mythology and philosophy.

His Nobel Prize became a defining moment not only for Nigeria but for the entire African continent, affirming that African voices deserved equal recognition on the world’s highest literary stage.

Advertisement

Soyinka’s remarkable body of work remains one of the richest contributions to modern literature. His plays continue to challenge audiences with their depth, symbolism and political relevance.

The Lion and the Jewel brilliantly explores the tensions between tradition and modernity.

The Strong Breed examines sacrifice and communal responsibility. Death and the King’s Horseman, widely regarded as one of the greatest plays ever written, masterfully interrogates colonialism, cultural misunderstanding and moral obligation.

Advertisement

A Dance of the Forests, commissioned during Nigeria’s independence celebrations, remains a timeless reminder that nation-building requires honest confrontation with history rather than romantic self-deception.

His novels equally occupy an honoured place in world literature. The Interpreters captured the complexities confronting Nigeria’s post-independence intellectual class, while Season of Anomy explored resistance against corruption and authoritarianism.

His memoirs – including Ake: The Years of ChildhoodYou Must Set Forth at Dawn and The Man Died – offer profound insights into both personal experience and national history.

Advertisement

His essays consistently display the razor-sharp intellect and fearless honesty that have become his trademarks.

Beyond literature, Soyinka’s poetry possesses remarkable emotional and philosophical depth.

His verses weave together mythology, politics, spirituality and human suffering, demanding thoughtful engagement from readers while rewarding them with profound insight.

Advertisement

His command of language remains extraordinary, effortlessly combining Yoruba cosmology with universal themes that resonate across cultures.

Yet it is impossible to celebrate Wole Soyinka without acknowledging his lifelong activism. Throughout his life, he has repeatedly placed principle above personal comfort.

During Nigeria’s civil war, he courageously sought peaceful dialogue and paid dearly for it, enduring solitary confinement for nearly two years.

Advertisement

Rather than silence him, imprisonment strengthened his resolve. His prison writings remain among the most compelling testimonies to the resilience of the human spirit.

Across successive military dictatorships and civilian administrations alike, Soyinka has consistently spoken truth to power.

He has criticised injustice wherever he has found it, refusing to align himself permanently with any political establishment.

Advertisement

His loyalty has always been to democratic values, human rights and the welfare of ordinary citizens rather than to transient governments or political personalities.

His moral courage has inspired generations of journalists, academics, students, lawyers, playwrights and civil society activists throughout Africa and beyond.

Even those who disagree with his opinions readily acknowledge the integrity that underpins his convictions.

Advertisement

Professor Soyinka’s influence extends well beyond Nigeria’s borders. Few African intellectuals command such an extensive global network.

He has taught at leading universities across the world, including institutions in Nigeria, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates, enriching generations of students with his vast knowledge of literature, theatre, history and political thought.

As a visiting professor, lecturer and public intellectual, he has become one of Africa’s most respected ambassadors in global academia.

Advertisement

His friendships and professional relationships span Nobel laureates, presidents, diplomats, artists, philosophers, actors and fellow writers from every continent.

He has shared platforms with world leaders while remaining equally comfortable engaging young students in classrooms and public forums.

His influence cuts across disciplines, making him not merely a literary figure but a global statesman of ideas.

Advertisement

International organisations frequently seek his counsel on democracy, cultural identity, freedom of expression and conflict resolution.

Universities continue to honour him with numerous honorary doctorates and distinguished fellowships.

Literary festivals across the world celebrate his contributions, while scholars devote entire careers to studying his works and philosophy.

Advertisement

One of Soyinka’s greatest achievements has been his ability to bridge Africa and the wider world without sacrificing his cultural authenticity.

He has never diluted his African identity to gain international acceptance. Instead, he has demonstrated that authentic African experiences possess universal relevance.

His writings affirm that local histories, indigenous beliefs and African traditions deserve equal space within global intellectual discourse.

Advertisement

His passion for theatre has similarly transformed African performance traditions.

Through the Orisun Theatre Company and countless productions, he elevated African drama onto the international stage while nurturing generations of playwrights, actors and directors.

Many of Africa’s leading literary voices acknowledge Soyinka as mentor, inspiration or intellectual guide.

Advertisement

At 92, his curiosity remains undiminished. He continues to write, travel, lecture and participate in conversations about democracy, governance, security, education, cultural preservation and global affairs.

His voice retains its unmistakable authority because it is anchored not in political expediency but in lifelong consistency.

Nigeria owes Professor Soyinka an immense debt of gratitude. In an era when integrity often appears negotiable, he has demonstrated that intellectual independence remains possible.

Advertisement

He has shown that scholarship should illuminate society rather than merely decorate academic institutions.

He has reminded writers that literature carries moral responsibility, and he has inspired countless young Africans to believe that ideas can indeed change nations.

His legacy cannot be measured solely by books published, awards received or speeches delivered.

Advertisement

It resides in the generations of thinkers he has inspired, the freedoms he has defended and the courage he has exemplified.

He has become one of the defining moral voices of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

As Professor Wole Soyinka marks his 92nd birthday, Nigerians, Africans and admirers across the globe celebrate a life magnificently lived in service to literature, justice and humanity.

Advertisement

His pen has challenged dictators, comforted the oppressed, educated generations and elevated African literature to its rightful place in the world.

Also read: President Tinubu Felicitates Babatunde Ogala, SAN, at 65

May the years ahead continue to bless this extraordinary son of Africa with good health, clarity of mind and enduring strength. His voice remains indispensable, his example timeless and his legacy immortal.

Happy 92nd birthday, Professor Wole Soyinka.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Facebook Nigeria vs ARCON’s judgment: Not about fine but consumer protection at risk of vulnerability

Published

on

Facebook

By Ewa Izuchukwu,

It’s no longer news that the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has recently set aside the ₦60 billion regulatory fine the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) impose on Facebook Nigeria Operations Limited (FNOL) in October 2024. Hon Justice Yelim Bogoro’s decision in suit FHC/L/CS/2205/2024 has been reported widely in the days since, and much of that reporting has fixated on the size of fine, sixty billion naira which, as expected will make the headlines.

Advertisement

Read more: Court Confirms ARCON’s Oversight Powers on Outdoor Advertising

But the fine itself is close to old news, and any editorial honestly reckoning with this judgment has to say so plainly. As far back as April 2025, Justice Akintayo Aluko, sitting in the same Federal High Court in Lagos, had already settled whether ARCON may impose fines directly.

In Digi Bay Limited (trading as Betway Nigeria) v. ARCON, Justice Aluko held that a fine is a judicial act reserved for a competent court or the Advertising Offences Tribunal, not an administrative agency, and declared ARCON’s fine against Betway unconstitutional and void.

ARCON appears to have absorbed that lesson in the cases that followed including Godec Power Nigeria Ltd. v. ARCON in November 2025, Watercress Hotel International Limited v. ARCON in June 2026, as the agency confined itself to regularisation of exposed unapproved adverts and Advertising Tribunal referrals.

Advertisement

By the time Facebook Nigeria’s case came up for judgment, that question had already been asked and answered a year earlier. Voiding the fine was, by that point, close to a formality.

Which is precisely why the fine is the least interesting part of Justice Bogoro’s judgment, and why the media narrative being pushed largely missed the real story.

The issues that ought to be commanding attention are the fourth and fifth decisions of the Federal High Court which set out to determine whether Meta Platforms Inc. and Facebook Nigeria Ltd are separate and distinct legal entities, and whether Facebook Nigeria acted as an agent of Meta in Nigeria.

Advertisement

On both counts, the court held that ARCON had failed to discharge the burden of proof, finding no evidence of a corporate nexus beyond the two companies’ separate legal existence, and therefore no basis on which Facebook Nigeria could answer for anything connected to Meta’s platforms. This means, money can be made by Facebook in Nigeria market, but accountability and responsibility will shift to the Head Office in the USA which claimed it’s out of Nigeria’s legal jurisdiction.

Those findings and subsequent decision, not the fine imposed, are what should have produced a press statement or shape media narrative as these are landmark decisions.

The evidentiary gap in the ruling

Advertisement

The conclusion is, on its face, startling, because the relationship between Facebook Nigeria and Meta is not exactly a secret that requires forensic excavation.

Meta’s own terms of service, unchanged for years, identify Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram as products of Meta Platforms, Inc. Facebook Nigeria Operations Limited’s very name signals its function as an operating entity for Meta’s Nigerian market, its representatives based in Lagos, its correspondence running through Meta’s own domains.

That such linkages could be found legally unproven raises the question of whether the necessary homework was done by the Hon Court to arrive at finding that runs against easily verifiable commercial reality.

Advertisement

That concern deepens against the longer background of ARCON’s own dealings with Meta. This was not the regulator’s first attempt to pin accountability on a Meta-linked entity in Nigeria.

In October 2022, ARCON sued Meta Platforms directly alongside its Nigerian agent, AT3 Resources Limited, over the exposure of unvetted advertisements shown to the Nigerian audience, in Abuja.

That Abuja case lingered for close to two years, shuffled between several adjournments, without ever being tested on the merits, before ARCON’s counsel discontinued it in July 2024. It was withdrawn. That withdrawal cleared the ground for the fresh dispute that would eventually surface in Lagos as Facebook Nigeria sue ARCON.

Advertisement

Particularly interesting is that this is not the first time Nigerian courts have entertained proceedings against Meta without putting the burden of or insisting that litigants first unravel every layer of the company’s global corporate architecture.

Most recently in the Falana v. Meta Platforms Inc. case, the Lagos High Court permitted proceedings arising from the alleged unauthorised use of the human rights lawyer’s name and image on Facebook, treating Meta as the proper party without placing the burden on the claimant to establish the nexus between Meta Platforms Inc. and Facebook before assuming jurisdiction.

Similarly, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission fined the company $220 million for abusing Nigerian users’ data, treating Meta as answerable in Nigeria without requiring anyone to first prove an elaborate corporate map.

Advertisement

If one Nigerian regulator could establish that accountability, the difficulty ARCON says it encountered doing something similar deserves closer scrutiny.

Several attempt by META INC to use corporate separateness in other countries failed 

Nigeria is not the only jurisdiction where Meta has tried to use corporate separateness as a shield, and other courts have not been so easily persuaded.

Advertisement

In Kenya, Meta argued for years that it could not be sued over the treatment of Facebook content moderators because it did not directly employ them.

Kenya’s employment court rejected that, ruling that Meta was the primary employer because the moderators did Meta’s work and were held to its metrics, and that Sama was “merely an agent”; Kenya’s Court of Appeal upheld that decision despite Meta’s claim to be a foreign company outside the court’s reach.

In Australia, the fact pattern was almost identical to Nigeria’s. A case brought by the Australian Information Commissioner concerned Facebook Inc, serving North American users, and Facebook Ireland, serving everyone else; Facebook Inc argued it could not be conducting business in Australia because only Facebook Ireland was, with no assets or revenues of its own there.

Advertisement

The Full Federal Court rejected that, treating the data-processing arrangement between the two entities as evidence Facebook Inc itself was conducting business in Australia, and separately refused Facebook Inc’s bid to escape service of process.

The European Union offers a third instance, involving the very architecture Meta uses to separate its foreign operations from its American parent. Facebook Inc. routes non-US, non-Canada business through a distinct Irish company, Facebook Ireland Ltd, described in its own filings as the data controller for those users, structured to keep the US parent at arm’s length from foreign regulators.

It did not work indefinitely: Ireland’s Data Protection Commission fined the Irish subsidiary itself a record €1.2 billion and ordered it to halt unlawful transfers to its own parent.

Advertisement

Even inside the United States, Meta has run the same play against its own government. In a Vermont lawsuit over Instagram’s design and its effects on teenagers, Meta argued it could not be sued there because neither it nor the app had specific ties to the state; Vermont countered that Instagram’s large teen user base there was enough.

The US Supreme Court declined to hear Meta’s appeal in May 2026, leaving it exposed in a suit naming both Meta Platforms, Inc. and Instagram, LLC.

National Security & Who answers when it matters?

Advertisement

This is where the fixation on fine has led the conversation astray. The money was never really the point but whether anyone in Nigeria can be held to account for what happens on these platforms which is a critical part of the digital economy.

If a court has found, on the evidence before it, that a platform’s local entity bears no legal relationship to the global parent that owns and profits from it, the country has stumbled into a template for regulatory evasion that extends well past Meta, to every multinational platform and organisation doing business in Nigeria.

Facebook and Instagram are not neutral pipes. They are marketplaces where cars, phones, drugs, and, on occasion, weapons and other contraband get advertised to Nigerian audiences; where scams targeting bank accounts run, and where harmful content reaches Nigerian children.

Advertisement

So, to ask the plain question this judgment leaves hanging… when a fraudulent investment scheme, a counterfeit pharmaceutical, or worse is advertised to Nigerians through Facebook or Instagram, who is answerable in a Nigerian court? If Facebook Nigeria Operations Limited has just been found to bear no proven relationship to the platform it operates, the honest answer is no one in this country. That is a national security and economic-sovereignty question that deserves an urgent answer.

This judgement may start a new window of corporate separateness, become a challenge to accountability and responsibility which multi nationals and global organisation may explore with Nigerians unfortunately being dealt the short end of the stick.

Also read: Napoli Threaten Disciplinary Action Against Lukaku

In the interest of the public, the judiciary owe Nigerians beyond legal technicalities and prima facie evidence, the obligation to do an extensive review on this case to protect the generality of the public. Until then, the fine everyone is talking about is the least of what this judgment may cost the country.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending