Connect with us

news

When the Rain Becomes the Messenger: Lagos Is Not Flooding by Accident

Published

on

Lagos

Repeated floods expose the cost of poor drainage, waste management and shrinking wetlands as experts urge Lagos to rethink urban resilience

“In Nigeria, when rain falls for just three hours, WhatsApp becomes a rescue centre. Somebody is stranded. Somebody’s car is floating.

Advertisement

Also read: Flooding Collapses 2 Classroom Blocks in Anambra School

Somebody is asking for a canoe in Lekki. Then someone will inevitably conclude: ‘This rain is from the village.’ Perhaps not. Perhaps this one came from our own hands.”

Every rainy season in Nigeria follows a familiar script. The rain falls. The roads disappear. Cars become boats. Homes become swimming pools.

Government officials promise action. Citizens blame government. Government blames citizens.

Advertisement

Then the sun comes out, floodwaters recede, memories fade, and we return to business as usual, until the next downpour reminds us that nature has a longer memory than we do.

But here is an inconvenient truth. Our cities are not being defeated by nature. They are being defeated by our own choices.

The story of flooding in Lagos and many Nigerian cities is no longer simply about rainfall.

Advertisement

It is about governance, environmental stewardship, urban planning, and perhaps most importantly, our collective disregard for the natural systems that once protected us.

Now hear this. The Rain Is Not the Villain! According to the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet), the 2025 and 2026 Seasonal Climate Predictions warned of above-normal rainfall across many parts of Nigeria.

Likewise, the Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) consistently identifies hundreds of communities across dozens of states as being at significant flood risk each year. The rain did exactly what scientists predicted.

Advertisement

However, the real surprise is that many of us behaved as if nobody warned us.

Climate change is certainly making extreme weather more frequent and more intense.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has repeatedly warned that warming temperatures are increasing the frequency of heavy rainfall events worldwide.

Advertisement

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) also notes that urban flooding is becoming one of the fastest-growing climate risks globally.

But climate change alone does not explain why some neighbourhoods flood after two hours of rain while others remain relatively safe. The difference often lies beneath our feet.

What did we do? We closed nature’s escape routes. Rainwater has always known where to go.

Advertisement

For centuries it flowed through wetlands, streams, floodplains, forests and natural drainage channels before eventually reaching lagoons and rivers.

Like people without knowledge, we ‘intervened’. We paved almost everything. We filled wetlands. We built on river setbacks. We reclaimed natural floodplains.

We removed mangroves. We replaced soil with concrete.

Advertisement

Then we wondered why the water refused to disappear. Water has nowhere to go because we have occupied its home.

As environmental planners often remind us, ‘every building constructed on a wetland is effectively asking water to negotiate for space. Water rarely loses that negotiation’.

In another magical move, we turn our drains into refuse dumps. Our drains are clogged with refuse because, for too long, we have refused to confront the consequences of our actions.

Advertisement

Plastic bottles, pure water sachets, food wrappers, construction debris, household waste, old mattresses, tyres, and everything except water.

Walk through many communities after rainfall and one uncomfortable truth becomes obvious. Many drainage channels no longer function as drainage channels. They have become unofficial waste bins.

Citizens certainly deserve criticism for indiscriminate disposal of waste. But that is only one side of the story.
Lagos has a waste management problem we can no longer pretend does not exist.

Advertisement

Lagos, our Lagos.

The commercial heartbeat of Nigeria. The city that prides itself as Africa’s mega city. The warning signs have existed for years.

This year’s heavy rains merely exposed what many residents have quietly endured. In the community where I live, household refuse has remained uncollected for more than four months. Unfortunately, this is no longer unusual.

Advertisement

Over the past two years, delays stretching three, four, sometimes even six months have become disturbingly common. Residents are left with impossible choices.

Store decomposing waste indefinitely. Dump it illegally. Or burn it. Some reluctantly choose the last option, not because they enjoy polluting the environment, but because they fear disease outbreaks more than smoke.

The result? Communities exchange one environmental disaster for another. Toxic smoke. Air pollution. Respiratory discomfort.

Advertisement

Neighbourhood disputes. Children and elderly residents inhaling dangerous fumes.

This cannot be the waste management strategy of a 21st-century mega city.

The situation becomes even more alarming around major markets and commercial corridors.

Advertisement

Refuse heaps now occupy portions of roads meant for vehicles and pedestrians. Environmental sanitation exercises come and go. The refuse remains.

Sometimes waste is removed from blocked drainage channels only to be left beside the gutters for days or weeks. The next rainfall simply washes much of it back into the drains. The cycle begins again.

It would appear that the Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA), despite the commitment of many of its personnel, is carrying a burden that has outgrown its current operational model.

Advertisement

The system is overwhelmed. Pretending otherwise serves nobody. The human cost is bigger than statistics.

Flooding is often discussed using numbers. Properties destroyed. Roads submerged. Economic losses. Insurance claims. But behind every statistic is a family.

Someone loses a lifetime investment. Someone’s business inventory disappears overnight.

Advertisement

A student loses school books.

A trader loses her shop. A family spends weeks repairing walls already weakened by repeated flooding.

According to the World Bank, flooding remains one of the costliest natural hazards affecting urban economies, with poor households bearing the greatest burden because they often live in vulnerable locations and have limited resources for recovery.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) estimates that nature-based infrastructure such as wetlands, urban forests and green spaces significantly reduces flood risks while improving air quality and public health. Ironically, these are precisely the systems many cities continue to destroy.

Governance Matters Floods are acts of nature. Flood disasters are often failures of governance. Good governance anticipates.

It plans, enforces, educates, invests, maintains, and responds. Urban resilience cannot depend solely on emergency responses after floodwaters have entered people’s living rooms. It begins months and years before the first drop of rain falls.

Advertisement

Here comes a new environmental contract. Lagos, and indeed Nigeria, needs a complete rethink of urban waste management. Not cosmetic adjustments. Not temporary interventions. A structural redesign.

Waste management should become a genuinely collaborative enterprise involving residents, Community Development Associations (CDAs), Local Governments and LCDAs, private operators, recyclers, environmental professionals, market associations and state agencies. In fact, the LGAs and LCDAs should be playing a more deeper role in the management and enforcement of the environment waste management.

Lagos has grown and gone beyond the present arrangement started over 20 years ago.

Advertisement

They should be involve also in the recycling ecosystem. Recycling must move from policy documents into neighbourhood reality.

Communities should be incentivised to separate waste at source. Plastic should become an economic resource rather than a drainage problem.

Digital monitoring should improve collection efficiency. Performance indicators should be transparent.

Advertisement

Residents should know when waste collection is expected, and agencies should be accountable when those schedules fail. Equally important is enforcement. Illegal dumping cannot become socially acceptable.

Planning regulations protecting wetlands, river setbacks and drainage corridors must be enforced consistently, irrespective of influence or status. No city successfully manages flooding while simultaneously allowing natural drainage systems to disappear.

Finally, Lagos must accelerate the implementation of its flood management strategy by combining engineered infrastructure with nature-based solutions, by expanding drainage where necessary, restoring wetlands where possible, increasing urban tree cover, and ensuring routine maintenance long before the rains arrive.

Advertisement

The choice before us. Perhaps the rain deserves an apology. For years, we have blamed it for problems it did not create. Rain merely exposes the quality of our planning.

It reveals whether governance works. It tests whether citizens respect the environment. It uncovers whether institutions respond before crises instead of after them.

As another rainy season unfolds, perhaps the better question is no longer, “Why is Lagos flooding?” The real question is:

Advertisement

“How much longer will we continue manufacturing the very disasters we blame on nature?” Because the next time the skies open, the rain will simply do what rain has always done.

The rest will depend on what WE have done before it arrived. And if we continue treating our drains as dustbins and our wetlands as vacant real estate, then we should not be surprised when the water calmly replies in familiar Nigerian fashion:

Also read: Lagos Attributes Lekki Flooding to Illegal Construction and Waste Disposal

“Na una call me.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

sports

Maresca Says Man City Unity Grows Amid Financial Case

Published

on

Maresca says Man City unity grows amid the club’s financial case as the manager focuses on results ahead of Saturday’s Premier League clash with Ipswich.

Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca has said the club’s players, supporters and leadership have become more united amid the Premier League financial case, speaking at a pre-match press conference in Manchester on Friday, 16 October 2026, ahead of Saturday’s league meeting with Ipswich Town.

Also read: NPFL Suspends Fan Over Alleged Threats to Away Teams

Maresca said he was not personally troubled by the controversy, arguing that the team had little control over the proceedings and should concentrate on performances on the pitch.

Advertisement

“Since the noise, from my personal point of view, I can see the fans, the club, the team more together, for sure,” Maresca said.

His comments come as City continue their Premier League campaign under the scrutiny of a significant disciplinary case.

An independent commission found the club guilty of multiple breaches of the league’s financial regulations, following allegations concerning its financial reporting and commercial arrangements between 2009 and 2018.

Advertisement

Manchester City have rejected the findings and appealed the decision, maintaining that they have evidence to challenge the ruling. The appeal means the dispute remains unresolved, with the eventual outcome potentially carrying significant consequences for the club.

For now, Maresca has sought to keep the focus on football, presenting the team’s response to the controversy as a matter of discipline and collective responsibility rather than public argument.

“There is noise around the club but we need to try to make our noise,” he said. “That means win at Anfield, try to win tomorrow against Ipswich. This is the way we can make our noise. A different kind of noise; we’re not able to control that.”

Advertisement

City’s recent results have offered both encouragement and a reminder of the demands of competing across several fronts.

The club recorded a 3-0 Premier League victory over Liverpool at Anfield before suffering a 4-2 defeat by Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League on Wednesday.

Maresca described the European loss as a learning opportunity, saying City had struggled to maintain their balance after conceding twice in quick succession.

Advertisement

He nevertheless pointed to the response after half-time as evidence that the players could recover from difficult spells.

The defeat has added importance to Saturday’s meeting with Ipswich, as City look to maintain their domestic momentum while managing the demands of a busy schedule.

Asked how he was coping with the attention surrounding the financial proceedings, Maresca was direct.

Advertisement

“I’m very happy. I don’t feel any kind of stress about the outside situation because it’s something I don’t control. I just focus on how we can try to win the next games,” he said.

The manager also indicated that he trusted the club’s leadership and had discussed the case with officials. However, he preferred to wait for the legal process to reach an outcome before drawing conclusions about the matter.

The independent commission’s findings have intensified scrutiny of City’s financial conduct, with the case involving alleged breaches over a nine-season period.

Advertisement

The commission found the club guilty of 114 of the 115 charges relating to financial misconduct and associated failures to comply with the Premier League’s investigation, according to reports on the ruling.

City have appealed and continue to contest the findings. The distinction between the commission’s conclusions and the club’s position remains central to the ongoing dispute.

The case has also renewed debate about financial regulation in English football, including the effectiveness of oversight and the consequences clubs may face when they breach competition rules.

Advertisement

Any eventual sanctions will depend on the relevant proceedings and their outcome.

Against that background, Maresca’s emphasis on unity reflects the club’s immediate priority of sustaining results while the case progresses.

His comments do not resolve the questions raised by the commission, but they indicate how he intends to manage the situation within the dressing room.

Advertisement

Saturday’s fixture presents a further test. Ipswich have had a full week to prepare, while City return to domestic action after their midweek European commitment.

Maresca acknowledged that the difference in preparation time could make the contest demanding.

A victory would give City the opportunity to extend their Premier League winning run to seven matches, reinforcing their position near the top of the table.

Advertisement

The manager’s challenge is to ensure that the off-field controversy does not distract from the consistency required over a long season.

For supporters, the coming weeks will bring two parallel developments: City’s pursuit of domestic and European success, and the progress of the financial appeal.

The club’s results may shape the mood around the team, but the disciplinary proceedings will ultimately be determined by the relevant legal and regulatory process.

Advertisement

Maresca’s message was that City should concentrate on the part of the situation they can influence.

Also read: NPFL Suspends Fan Over Alleged Threats to Away Teams

With Ipswich next on the schedule, the immediate measure of that approach will be the team’s performance on the pitch, while the broader questions surrounding the club’s financial conduct remain outstanding.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending