Comedian Woli Arole criticises university fellowship leaders for exploiting students by demanding food as religious first fruits on Nigerian campuses
Woli Arole condemns campus exploitation in a bold statement aimed at university fellowship leaders who, he claims, abuse their spiritual roles by making inappropriate demands from students.
The popular Nigerian comedian and actor voiced his frustration on social media, accusing certain student religious leaders of manipulating their peers under the guise of spirituality.
In an Instagram post that has sparked widespread reaction, Arole took aim at the practice of so-called “Papas” and “Mamas” within student fellowships.
He criticised those who ask other students to donate their food items as a form of “first fruit,” a concept typically associated with tithing or spiritual offering.
“I heard they are already calling you ‘Papa and Mama’ in the university because you are a fellowship leader, and you are also telling students to bring their foodstuffs as first fruit.
What nonsense,” Arole wrote, expressing both disbelief and disappointment.
The comedian, known for blending humour with advocacy, made it clear that religious leadership should not be used as a means to take advantage of others.
His comments have resonated with many who have witnessed or experienced similar trends within campus fellowships, where leadership sometimes blurs the line between guidance and exploitation.
While the tradition of student fellowships plays a vital role in the spiritual development of many undergraduates, Arole’s remarks have reignited debate about accountability and ethics among young religious leaders.
Some students say the pressure to conform to these unregulated practices can be emotionally and financially draining.
Arole, a graduate and former campus fellowship member himself, urged those in leadership positions to act responsibly and with sincerity. He emphasised that influence should not be used for personal gain but rather for uplifting and supporting others.
His message is being viewed as a necessary wake-up call to address unchecked behaviours that thrive within loosely monitored religious structures on campuses.
By challenging what he sees as manipulative practices, Arole hopes to inspire a return to authenticity and mutual respect in student faith communities.
As conversations continue online and in university circles, many are calling for greater awareness and guidance on acceptable boundaries in student religious life.
Arole’s outburst has not only stirred attention but also forced a reflection on the proper use of spiritual authority among youths.