Connect with us

Economy

Nigeria Crude Exports Hit N20.22tn in First Five Months

Published

on

Nigeria

Nigeria crude exports reached an estimated 148.9 million barrels valued at N20.22tn in the first five months of 2026, despite concerns over domestic refinery feedstock supply

Nigeria exported an estimated 148.9 million barrels of crude oil valued at about N20.22tn in the first five months of 2026, showcasing the scale of the country’s oil trade despite persistent concerns over production levels.

Advertisement

Also read: MAN Demands Transparent Naira-for-Crude Pricing

The crude barrels were exported by both international and indigenous oil companies, including the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

While the export of crude oil may lead to a lack of sufficient domestic feedstock for Dangote Petroleum Refinery and other local refineries, it boosts the country’s foreign exchange earnings.

An analysis of crude oil production and export data for January to May 2026 showed that the country’s crude exports were worth approximately $14.66bn, equivalent to N20.22tn at an exchange rate of N1,380 to the dollar.

Advertisement

In comparison, Nigeria exported 154 million barrels of crude worth about $11.32bn during the same period of 2025. Although export volume in 2026 fell by 5.1 million barrels, representing a 3.3 per cent decline, the export value jumped by about $3.33bn, or 29.5 per cent, driven by significantly higher crude oil prices this year.

The figures obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria indicate that the total volume of crude oil produced by the country during the five-month review period in 2026 was 216.85 million barrels, with a gross market value of approximately $21.28bn, or about N29.36tn, using the same exchange rate.

A breakdown of the CBN figures showed that Nigeria produced about 45.26 million barrels in January, 36.68 million barrels in February, 42.78 million barrels in March, 44.70 million barrels in April, and 47.43 million barrels in May.

Advertisement

Crude exports followed a similar trend, with 31.31 million barrels exported in January, 24.08 million barrels in February, 28.83 million barrels in March, 31.20 million barrels in April, and 33.48 million barrels in May.

Overall, Nigeria exported about 68.7 per cent of the crude oil it produced during the five months, leaving roughly 67.95 million barrels available for domestic refining, storage, operational use, and inventory adjustments.

The effect of the US-Iran war was also felt in the monthly average prices of crude from March to May. In January and February, before the war started, average crude prices were $68.05 and $72.33 a barrel.

Advertisement

But the prices jumped to $106.09 in March, $126.71 in April, and $112.63 in May, reflecting the sharp rise in crude prices due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

This Nigeria crude exports surge in value despite lower volumes highlights the impact of higher international oil prices on the country’s earnings.

Domestic crude supply to Nigeria’s refineries declined to 15.84 million barrels in May 2026, even as the facilities achieved a combined intake of 17.92 million barrels for the month, according to the latest midstream and downstream statistics released by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority.

Advertisement

The Dangote refinery has recently accused the Federal Government and its agencies of alleged deliberate sabotage, undermining its operations and frustrating its investment in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector, an allegation the Federal Government denied.

Also read: NNPC Crude Output Rise Signals Strong Recovery Boost

This Nigeria crude exports performance underscores the tension between maximising foreign exchange earnings and ensuring adequate feedstock for local refining capacity.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

Owei Lakemfa criticises Tinubu’s fuel subsidy policy

Published

on

Owei Lakemfa fuel subsidy criticism challenges Tinubu’s petrol policy, highlighting rising prices, workers’ purchasing power and Nigeria’s refining challenges

Advertisement

Nigerian columnist and former journalist Owei Lakemfa has criticised President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to remove petrol subsidies, arguing in an opinion article published by Vanguard on Monday, 26 October 2026, that Nigeria’s persistent fuel-price pressures reflect years of policy failures, inadequate domestic refining and weak public accountability rather than an unavoidable shortage of petroleum resources.

Also read:Mbappé, Yamal, Kane, Olise Battle for Ballon d’Or

In his article, titled We Never Left Egypt, Only Prodigals Need to Return Home, Lakemfa challenges Tinubu’s comparison between the biblical story of Moses leading the Israelites out of Egypt and the government’s decision not to restore petrol subsidies.

Advertisement

The columnist uses the metaphor to argue that Nigerians should not be expected to accept worsening living conditions in a country endowed with substantial natural resources.

The article follows remarks made by Tinubu on 19 October at an event organised by the City Boy Movement, where the President defended the removal of petrol subsidies and rejected calls to restore the policy.

Advertisement

“I came and I removed subsidy the first day. I knew Nigeria would go bankrupt. There was nothing left to pay subsidy,” Tinubu said, according to TheCable’s report of the event.

Advertisement

The President also invoked the biblical account of Moses and the Red Sea, arguing that Nigeria should not return to the former subsidy arrangement.

He urged young Nigerians to obtain their permanent voter cards and participate in the 2027 presidential election.

Advertisement

Lakemfa takes a sharply different view. He argues that Nigeria’s oil resources, historical refining capacity and revenue potential should provide a stronger foundation for economic security than many households currently experience.

The columnist recalls Nigeria’s development of commercial oil production in the 1950s and its subsequent operation of four state-owned refineries.

Advertisement

He also cites a 1973 statement by former Head of State Yakubu Gowon that money was not Nigeria’s principal problem, but how it was spent.

For Lakemfa, the central question is not whether the country possesses oil, but how successive administrations have managed its petroleum resources and the revenues generated from them.

Advertisement

He alleges that years of inadequate refinery maintenance, insufficient investment in domestic refining and dependence on imported petroleum products have contributed to the difficulties facing consumers.

He also questions the cost structures associated with importing, transporting and distributing petrol.

Advertisement

His criticism reflects a wider debate over whether Nigeria can reduce its exposure to international oil-price movements and foreign-exchange pressures by strengthening domestic refining and improving transparency across the petroleum supply chain.

Advertisement

Nigeria’s fuel-subsidy debate predates the current administration. Successive governments have struggled with the cost of keeping petrol prices below market levels, concerns over smuggling, the financial burden on public finances and disputes over whether the benefits of subsidised fuel reach the intended beneficiaries.

Tinubu announced the removal of petrol subsidies during his inauguration on 29 May 2023.

Advertisement

The decision triggered a sharp increase in pump prices and contributed to public concern over transportation costs, inflation and household purchasing power.

Lakemfa argues that the promised developmental benefits of subsidy removal have not adequately addressed the pressures experienced by ordinary Nigerians.

Advertisement

He points to concerns about public infrastructure, healthcare, education, housing and insecurity, while questioning how the additional revenues generated by the policy have been allocated and accounted for.

The Federal Government, however, maintains that retaining the former subsidy arrangement would impose an unsustainable financial burden.

Advertisement

It has argued that the reform is intended to improve fiscal stability and redirect public resources towards development priorities.

In October 2026, the Presidency announced additional measures to cushion the impact of rising global petroleum costs.

Advertisement

These included a temporary decision by NNPC Retail to forgo its petrol retail profit margin, alongside plans involving crude-oil supplies to domestic refineries and efforts to moderate fluctuations in fuel costs.

Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister of the Economy Taiwo Oyedele said the measures were intended to provide relief without restoring a blanket subsidy.

Advertisement

The government maintained that targeted interventions and support for domestic refining would be preferable to returning to a system that it considers financially unsustainable.

Rising international oil prices have also contributed to recent increases in Nigerian petrol prices. Nairametrics reported in September that petrol was selling at approximately ₦1,400 to ₦1,450 per litre in major cities, reflecting the influence of higher crude prices and wider market pressures.

Advertisement

Lakemfa nevertheless questions the extent to which international developments explain the difference between Nigeria’s pump prices and those in other oil-producing countries.

Advertisement

He draws on figures attributed to federal lawmaker Afam Victor Ogene, who compared petrol prices and minimum wages in Nigeria, Iran, Libya and Saudi Arabia.

The figures cited in the comparison placed Nigerian petrol at between ₦1,300 and ₦1,500 per litre, against substantially lower prices in the other countries.

Advertisement

A report by NN News Media published on 22 September also carried Ogene’s comparison, including the claim that Nigeria’s ₦70,000 national minimum wage buys significantly less petrol than the stated wage levels in the three other countries.

The comparison highlights the relationship between fuel prices and workers’ purchasing power.

Advertisement

However, the figures should be treated as attributed estimates rather than a fully standardised international comparison, as petrol pricing policies, exchange rates, wage coverage and subsidy arrangements differ between countries.

The Nigerian minimum wage was raised to ₦70,000 under legislation signed by Tinubu in July 2024. Since then, organised labour has continued to raise concerns about the erosion of workers’ purchasing power amid rising transportation, food and other household costs.

Advertisement

The Nigeria Labour Congress called in October 2026 for lower petrol prices and renewed minimum-wage negotiations, arguing that the existing wage floor had become inadequate in the face of escalating living expenses.

Advertisement

Lakemfa also challenges warnings attributed to Oyedele about the economic consequences of restoring petrol subsidies.

According to the columnist, predictions of further currency depreciation and petrol prices reaching ₦2,000 per litre require transparent calculations and supporting economic analysis.

Advertisement

The government’s position is that a return to blanket subsidies could increase fiscal pressures, encourage smuggling and expose public finances to renewed shocks.

The disagreement therefore extends beyond the immediate price of petrol to questions about the country’s fiscal priorities, energy policy and the distribution of economic costs.

Advertisement

At the heart of Lakemfa’s argument is the belief that Nigeria’s natural-resource wealth should translate into better living conditions for its population.

His reference to Egypt serves as a political metaphor for a country whose citizens, he argues, should not be expected to accept hardship as an inevitable consequence of economic reform.

Advertisement

He concludes that the responsibility for improving the country’s circumstances rests with its political leadership, calling for greater accountability and a renewed commitment to public welfare.

The debate over subsidy removal is likely to remain prominent as political parties prepare for the 2027 elections.

Advertisement

For the Federal Government, the challenge is to demonstrate that its economic reforms can deliver measurable benefits while protecting public finances.

Also read:Mbappé, Yamal, Kane, Olise Battle for Ballon d’Or

For critics such as Lakemfa, the priority is to ensure that the costs of reform do not continue to fall disproportionately on households already struggling with rising living expenses.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending